Field perspectives on multi-year humanitarian funding and planning: How theory has translated into practice in Jordan and Lebanon
Important evidence on the reality of predictable and flexible multi-year humanitarian funding in the contexts of Jordan and Lebanon, with recommendations for the global Grand Bargain workstream on enhanced quality of funding.
DownloadsField perspectives on multi-year humanitarian funding and planning: How theory has translated into practice in Jordan and Lebanon
Important evidence on the reality of predictable and flexible multi-year humanitarian funding in the contexts of Jordan and Lebanon, with recommendations for the global Grand Bargain workstream on enhanced quality of funding.
Read Online Download optionsExecutive summary
This research seeks to support the Grand Bargain workstream on enhanced quality of funding by providing evidence from two countries – Lebanon and Jordan – on multi-year humanitarian funding and…
Read the executive summaryChapter One
Introduction
At the Grand Bargain Annual Meeting in 2019, the provision of higher quality humanitarian funding was identified as a key enabler to move towards a more efficient and effective humanitarian…
Read chapter oneChapter Two
Multi-year humanitarian funding and planning in Lebanon and Jordan
This chapter outlines how MYHFP is perceived in both countries. After a brief description of the two country contexts it explores how MYHF is defined and to what extent it…
Read chapter two Download data for chapter two XLSX 175.0kBChapter Three
The benefits of multi-year humanitarian funding and planning
This chapter provides a summary of anecdotal evidence by actors in Jordan and Lebanon on the perceived and experienced benefits of MYHFP for the efficiency and effectiveness of the response.…
Read chapter threeChapter Four
Conclusion
It’s evident from the field experiences that the time frame of funding and planning is only part of the story. Funding needs to be accompanied by flexibility to adapt to…
Read chapter fourExecutive summary
This research seeks to support the Grand Bargain workstream on enhanced quality of funding by providing evidence from two countries – Lebanon and Jordan – on multi-year humanitarian funding and…
Read the executive summaryChapter One
Introduction
At the Grand Bargain Annual Meeting in 2019, the provision of higher quality humanitarian funding was identified as a key enabler to move towards a more efficient and effective humanitarian…
Read chapter oneChapter Two
Multi-year humanitarian funding and planning in Lebanon and Jordan
This chapter outlines how MYHFP is perceived in both countries. After a brief description of the two country contexts it explores how MYHF is defined and to what extent it…
Read chapter twoChapter Three
The benefits of multi-year humanitarian funding and planning
This chapter provides a summary of anecdotal evidence by actors in Jordan and Lebanon on the perceived and experienced benefits of MYHFP for the efficiency and effectiveness of the response.…
Read chapter threeChapter Four
Conclusion
It’s evident from the field experiences that the time frame of funding and planning is only part of the story. Funding needs to be accompanied by flexibility to adapt to…
Read chapter fourAcknowledgements
This report was produced in partnership between the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) and Development Initiatives (DI) and funded by the government of Canada.The paper was written by Niklas Rieger (Senior…
Read appendix oneInterviewees
Read appendix twoReferences
3RP, 2019. 2019 Progress Report. Available at: http://www.3rpsyriacrisis.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Midyear2019.pdfBruschini-Chaumet, C., Shama, H., Othman, N. & van Hilten, M., 2019. The Localization of Aid in Jordan and Lebanon: Barriers and Opportunities for…
Read appendix fourAcronyms
Read appendix fourShare Field perspectives on multi-year humanitarian funding and planning: How theory has translated into practice in Jordan and Lebanon
Related content
Donors at the triple nexus
DI Senior Policy & Engagement Advisor Sarah Dalrymple presents some of our recent analysis into how donors like Sweden and the UK are approaching the triple nexus between humanitarian, development and peace approaches in crisis contexts.
Implications of coronavirus on financing for sustainable development
DI Executive Director Harpinder Collacott summarises the possible impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on global development - including projections for extreme poverty, the future of different forms of financing, and the countries likely to be most impacted.
What do emerging trends in development finance mean for crisis actors?
DI's webinar ‘What do emerging trends in development finance mean for crisis actors?’ gives crisis actors key information on development finance to better understand what it means for them.