Field perspectives on multi-year humanitarian funding and planning: How theory has translated into practice in Jordan and Lebanon
Important evidence on the reality of predictable and flexible multi-year humanitarian funding in the contexts of Jordan and Lebanon, with recommendations for the global Grand Bargain workstream on enhanced quality of funding.
DownloadsField perspectives on multi-year humanitarian funding and planning: How theory has translated into practice in Jordan and Lebanon
Important evidence on the reality of predictable and flexible multi-year humanitarian funding in the contexts of Jordan and Lebanon, with recommendations for the global Grand Bargain workstream on enhanced quality of funding.
Read Online Download optionsExecutive summary
This research seeks to support the Grand Bargain workstream on enhanced quality of funding by providing evidence from two countries – Lebanon and Jordan – on multi-year humanitarian funding and…
Read the executive summaryChapter One
Introduction
At the Grand Bargain Annual Meeting in 2019, the provision of higher quality humanitarian funding was identified as a key enabler to move towards a more efficient and effective humanitarian…
Read chapter oneChapter Two
Multi-year humanitarian funding and planning in Lebanon and Jordan
This chapter outlines how MYHFP is perceived in both countries. After a brief description of the two country contexts it explores how MYHF is defined and to what extent it…
Read chapter two Download data for chapter two XLSX 175.0kBChapter Three
The benefits of multi-year humanitarian funding and planning
This chapter provides a summary of anecdotal evidence by actors in Jordan and Lebanon on the perceived and experienced benefits of MYHFP for the efficiency and effectiveness of the response.…
Read chapter threeChapter Four
Conclusion
It’s evident from the field experiences that the time frame of funding and planning is only part of the story. Funding needs to be accompanied by flexibility to adapt to…
Read chapter fourExecutive summary
This research seeks to support the Grand Bargain workstream on enhanced quality of funding by providing evidence from two countries – Lebanon and Jordan – on multi-year humanitarian funding and…
Read the executive summaryChapter One
Introduction
At the Grand Bargain Annual Meeting in 2019, the provision of higher quality humanitarian funding was identified as a key enabler to move towards a more efficient and effective humanitarian…
Read chapter oneChapter Two
Multi-year humanitarian funding and planning in Lebanon and Jordan
This chapter outlines how MYHFP is perceived in both countries. After a brief description of the two country contexts it explores how MYHF is defined and to what extent it…
Read chapter twoChapter Three
The benefits of multi-year humanitarian funding and planning
This chapter provides a summary of anecdotal evidence by actors in Jordan and Lebanon on the perceived and experienced benefits of MYHFP for the efficiency and effectiveness of the response.…
Read chapter threeChapter Four
Conclusion
It’s evident from the field experiences that the time frame of funding and planning is only part of the story. Funding needs to be accompanied by flexibility to adapt to…
Read chapter fourAcknowledgements
This report was produced in partnership between the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) and Development Initiatives (DI) and funded by the government of Canada.The paper was written by Niklas Rieger (Senior…
Read appendix oneInterviewees
Read appendix twoReferences
3RP, 2019. 2019 Progress Report. Available at: http://www.3rpsyriacrisis.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Midyear2019.pdfBruschini-Chaumet, C., Shama, H., Othman, N. & van Hilten, M., 2019. The Localization of Aid in Jordan and Lebanon: Barriers and Opportunities for…
Read appendix fourAcronyms
Read appendix fourShare Field perspectives on multi-year humanitarian funding and planning: How theory has translated into practice in Jordan and Lebanon
Related content
The Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2019
This year’s report contains detailed analysis of the international financing at work in crisis-affected contexts. Navigating the increasingly complex and changing financing landscape, the report includes new analysis of the wide range of resources going to recurrent and protracted crisis response countries.
Donors at the triple nexus: lessons from the United Kingdom
To address the impact of crisis on poverty, risk and vulnerability and ensure that ‘no one is left behind’, building synergies between short-term humanitarian assistance and longer-term development and peacebuilding approaches is vital.
Investments to end poverty 2018
The report explores how development finance is responding to the demands set by the Sustainable Development Goals and what changes and action are needed to ensure their aspirations become reality for all.