Development Initiatives
  • Our work
    • Poverty
      • Citizen-generated data
      • The P20 Initiative: data to leave no one behind
    • More on poverty
    • Resources
      • Investments to End Poverty
      • International Aid Transparency Initiative
    • More on resources
    • Data use
      • Data Support Service in Kenya and Uganda
      • Development Data Hub
    • More on data use
    • Humanitarian
      • Global humanitarian assistance report 2018
      • Monitoring the Grand Bargain commitment on transparency
    • More on humanitarian
  • Development Data Hub
  • News
  • Events
  • Blogs
    • Latest data blogs
      • What does new World Bank data tell us about progress on poverty?
      • The needs of Kenyans by county: exploring the latest poverty data
      • The latest trends in UK aid spending on nutrition
      • See latest data blogs
    • Latest comment blogs
      • UN appeals: What does underfunding really mean?
      • How can blended financing help the world’s poorest?
      • Development cooperation for improved data
      • See latest comment blogs
    • Latest innovation blogs
      • Exploring concepts and practices to increase data use: A short learning paper
      • What are the principles of joined-up data?
      • Opinion: The case for metadata
      • See latest innovation blogs
  • Publications
    • Latest publications
      • Underfunded appeals: Understanding the consequences, improving the system
      • Final ODA data for 2017 – persistent trends raise concerns
      • Filling the gaps in current global poverty data estimates
      • See all publications
    • Publication formats
      • Reports
      • Briefings
      • Factsheets
  • Media
    • Media
      • As the experts on data about poverty and resources, we can help journalists with a wide range of reliable statistics and evidence for articles that relate to our areas of work.
    • Latest press releases
      • Launch: Investments to End Poverty 2018
      • What do the 2018/2019 national budget estimates mean for Kenya's poorest households?
      • Development Initiatives named new host of the Global Nutrition Report
      • See all press releases
    • Useful links
      • Briefings
      • Data blog
      • Factsheets
  • About
    • About us
      • Our story
      • Our work
      • Our consultancy services
      • Our team
      • Finances — being transparent
      • Open DI — Publishing to IATI
      • Contact us
    • Working with us
      • Working for us
      • Vacancies
      • Partnerships

Searching Site...

×

Welcome to the new home of DI’s work on humanitarian financing.

We’ve moved our work from globalhumanitarianassistance.org to devinit.org/humanitarian. It’s the same work, just in a new place.

GFDRR response to GHA’s new report - Disaster risk reduction: Spending where it should count

Mar 20, 2012

Humanitarian

Commentary blogs


This new report from GHA provides evidence of a challenge that disaster risk reduction (DRR) practitioners have been highlighting for many years: despite increasing public and political recognition of the need for a focus on DRR, reinforced by countless high level statements and commitments, the international community has been unable to provide the funding needed to sufficiently reduce risk in developing countries.

Although quantifying the total investment needed to reduce risk to an acceptable level is difficult and context-specific, the growing humanitarian caseload indicates that current DRR investment is insufficient. Global dynamics, such as climate change, urbanization and environmental degradation, are increasing society’s disaster risk, and disasters are eliminating wealth faster than it is produced (as reported in the 2011 Global Assessment Report) which shows that greater investment is needed in mainstreaming DRR within sustainable development.

Due to the increasing need for disaster relief, humanitarian donors appear to better recognize the importance of DRR, and attempt to support it as best they can through their limited funds. This approach is inadequate in the long-term. Governments and their development partners should firstly prevent as much risk as is cost efficient, mitigate or transfer what they can of the remaining risk and then, recognizing that there will always be residual risk, prepare for it. Prevention and mitigation are primarily long-term development issues, while preparedness spans both humanitarian and development concerns. Yet in many cases, due to a lack of development investment in DRR, humanitarians are trying to fill gaps across the DRR spectrum. Predictable financing for achieving long-term DRR goals needs to come from development sources.

The report highlights that the negligible part of ODA that is dedicated to DRR is rarely focused on those countries which should be given priority as determined by an assessment of risks and needs. While recognizing that donors tend to have countries and/or regions of interest for a number of reasons, and that operational settings are challenging in some high-risk countries, the humanitarian principals of impartiality and neutrality should guide ODA for DRR: human and societal risk should therefore drive prioritization. Conflict and fragile states add an additional dimension of complexity, but recent efforts to better understand and implement disaster risk management in insecure contexts are showing promise.

Preparedness for response deserves special attention as it provides an opportunity to link humanitarian and development efforts. Yet in the current world of bifurcated aid structures, this potential for linkage is actually a liability, with preparedness often falling between humanitarian and development budget lines. A broader resilience approach, as advocated by a number of leading donors and agencies, aims to reduce vulnerability to all potential shocks, even those that are highly uncertain, while at the same time fostering socioeconomic growth which in turn further increases resilience. However, unless the current systems can find a better way to work together without creating yet another budget line, support for resilience will be challenged.

Comprehensive DRR aid tracking and monitoring is critical to successful implementation, results reporting, and to avoiding overlap of efforts across sectors. A sound framework for tracking DRR financing is not yet in place. As the report indicates, the quality of data reported on disaster-related aid needs considerable improvement. A major bottleneck in quantifying the resources dedicated to DRR within humanitarian or development aid is the lack of standardized definitions for recording such investments. The Hyogo Framework for Action Mid-Term Review in fact calls for increased standard-setting and development of tools and guidelines for DRR-sensitive planning and budgeting.

This lack of standards has meant that DRR has not been identified as a core sector or crosscutting issue in most aid providers’ accounting and reporting systems, and in some cases has resulted in inaccurate reporting using multiple definitions/criteria. There is also a lack of accounting procedure for direct investments in DRR, as well as for quantifying DRR investment components in related sector projects. In order to effectively target mechanisms that address the quality and quantity of ODA and other cooperation flows, a thorough review of aid architecture from a DRR perspective is needed. GFDRR and UNISDR have already begun tackling this challenge through a disaster aid tracking initiative.

Governments are ultimately responsible for the safety and well-being of their citizens. As GHA’s new report highlights, accessible information on domestic spending on DRR is generally limited. Standardization of global DRR finance tracking and budgetary definitions would naturally permeate national budgetary systems. However, we must be cognizant that in low-income countries, where national budgets are limited and resources must be distributed amongst many competing priorities, international support is needed to initiate the path of resilient growth. As a country becomes more resilient, disaster losses decrease, ensuring more domestic resources to invest in further growth and resilience.

Latest articles

From Humanitarian

UN appeals: What does underfunding really mean?

Underfunded appeals: Understanding the consequences, improving the system

Direct funding to local and national responders shows slow progress

Global humanitarian assistance report 2018

Progress report 1: Supporting Grand Bargain signatories in meeting commitments to greater transparency

Connecting IATI and FTS for streamlined humanitarian reporting

Related topics

  • data 31
  • disaster risk reduction 10
  • humanitarian need 38
  • Humanitarian Posts 234
  • natural disasters 31
  • preparedness 5
See all topics

Sections

Data blog Publications Events Working with us

Quick links

Contact us Topics Our consultancy services Open DI — publishing to IATI

Newsletter

Sign up for the Development Initiatives newsletter to receive regular news and updates from DI.

Creative Commons

This site's content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

© Development Initiatives 2018. Development Initiatives is the trading name of Development Initiatives Poverty Research Ltd, registered in England and Wales, Company No. 06368740;
DI International Ltd, registered in England and Wales, Company No. 5802543, Registered Address: North Quay House, Quay Side, Temple Back, Bristol, BS1 6FL, UK; and Development Initiatives Poverty Research America Inc. (a 501(C)3 company registered in the state of Delaware with the registration number 5737757), Registered Address: 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801. View our privacy policy. View our Modern slavery and human trafficking statement.