Development Initiatives
  • Our work
    • Poverty
      • Citizen-generated data
      • The P20 Initiative: data to leave no one behind
    • More on poverty
    • Resources
      • Investments to End Poverty
      • International Aid Transparency Initiative
    • More on resources
    • Data use
      • Data Support Service in Kenya and Uganda
      • Development Data Hub
    • More on data use
    • Humanitarian
      • Global humanitarian assistance report 2018
      • Monitoring the Grand Bargain commitment on transparency
    • More on humanitarian
  • Development Data Hub
  • News
  • Events
  • Blogs
    • Latest data blogs
      • What does new World Bank data tell us about progress on poverty?
      • The needs of Kenyans by county: exploring the latest poverty data
      • The latest trends in UK aid spending on nutrition
      • See latest data blogs
    • Latest comment blogs
      • UN appeals: What does underfunding really mean?
      • How can blended financing help the world’s poorest?
      • Development cooperation for improved data
      • See latest comment blogs
    • Latest innovation blogs
      • Exploring concepts and practices to increase data use: A short learning paper
      • What are the principles of joined-up data?
      • Opinion: The case for metadata
      • See latest innovation blogs
  • Publications
    • Latest publications
      • Six ways to refocus ODA to end poverty and meet the SDGs
      • Underfunded appeals: Understanding the consequences, improving the system
      • Final ODA data for 2017 – persistent trends raise concerns
      • See all publications
    • Publication formats
      • Reports
      • Briefings
      • Factsheets
  • Media
    • Media
      • As the experts on data about poverty and resources, we can help journalists with a wide range of reliable statistics and evidence for articles that relate to our areas of work.
    • Latest press releases
      • Launch: Investments to End Poverty 2018
      • What do the 2018/2019 national budget estimates mean for Kenya's poorest households?
      • Development Initiatives named new host of the Global Nutrition Report
      • See all press releases
    • Useful links
      • Briefings
      • Data blog
      • Factsheets
  • About
    • About us
      • Our story
      • Our work
      • Our consultancy services
      • Our team
      • Finances — being transparent
      • Open DI — Publishing to IATI
      • Contact us
    • Working with us
      • Working for us
      • Vacancies
      • Partnerships

Searching Site...

×

Welcome to the new home of DI’s work on humanitarian financing.

We’ve moved our work from globalhumanitarianassistance.org to devinit.org/humanitarian. It’s the same work, just in a new place.

Funding according to needs: the Niger food crisis 2010

Sep 28, 2010

Humanitarian

Commentary blogs


Niger is facing a severe food crisis following a drought and crop failure in late 2009, compounded by flooding in August. According to the UN’s World Food Programme (WFP), almost 50% of the population of Niger are in need of food aid this year. A major humanitarian response has mobilised and around US$251 million in humanitarian funds have been reported to the UN’s financial tracking service, which translates to about US$32 per person in humanitarian aid for the 7.9 million people affected (compared with US $80 per flood affected person in Pakistan and US$ 1,492 per earthquake affected person in Haiti).

That 2010 would be a bad year was known well in advance, following harvest failures in late 2009 and warnings issued by the government in January 2010 that 2.7 million people would be ‘severely vulnerable’ and 5.7 million ‘moderately vulnerable’ to food insecurity. The funding requirements for Niger included in the 2010 West Africa UN Consolidated Appeal however were a modest US$ 38 million, of which a meagre 11% was funded by the mid-year review point.

Figure 1. Total aid and humanitarian aid to Niger, Global Acute Malnutrition rates recorded in annual country-wide surveys conducted by Government of Niger (Sources: OECD DAC; UN OCHA FTS; Centre for Epidemiology of Disasters)

By April 2010, the government of Niger had declared an emergency and requested international assistance. The UN launched an Emergency Humanitarian Action Plan (EHAP) requesting US$ 191 million to meet the humanitarian funding needs of the rapidly evolving food crisis. Contributions to the EHAP have, in contrast to the predictable needs expressed in the UN West Africa appeal, arrived quickly.

In May, the target population for food delivery was doubled to 1.5 million people and following a country wide nutrition survey, that revealed a global acute malnutrition rate at 16.7% – above the WHO emergency threshold of 15% – the target population was substantially revised upwards again, to 4.5 million people. WFP is currently targeting 7.9 million people for food assistance. As the scale of the crisis became evident, appeal requirements were revised upwards in July to US$ 371 million.

In comparison with the 2005 food security crisis in Niger, emergency funding requests have been met promptly enabling early action.

The European Commission’s Directorate-General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (ECHO) made an emergency funding decision of EUR 10 million to the Sahel region in December 2009 followed by an additional allocation directly from the European Development Fund (EDF) in April 2010 of which EUR 15 million was for Niger.

The UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) released emergency funds early to existing NGO partners in late 2009 via their West Africa Humanitarian Response Fund and committed a further US $20 million to UN agencies and NGOs working in Niger between February and May 2010.

The UN’s Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) has provided funding to UN agencies to the tune of US$35 million, mostly under the ‘rapid response’ window, from May 2010.

Since mid-June 2010 the US government committed an additional US $13 million.

Agencies involved in the response have noted that early funding and improvements in surveillance and response capacity since 2005 has meant a much larger catastrophe has been mitigated. What is not entirely clear however are the reasons why the original requirements set out in the UN’s West Africa consolidated appeal were relatively low, when the crisis was predicted as early as October 2009, and why even those modest requirements met with such a disappointing funding response – until that is, a serious crisis began to unfold.

The levels of funding received within the EHAP for the emergency response in Niger dwarf the funds received for all the other humanitarian needs represented in the UN’s West Africa appeal.

Figure 3. Funding received against revised funding requirements within the UN West Africa appeal and Niger EHAP (Source: UN OCHA FTS, accessed 8th September 2010)

While donors have improved the speed of their funding response to acute humanitarian needs in Niger  since the 2005 crisis, it would appear from observing funding patterns across the Sahel and West Africa regions in 2010, that manifest acute humanitarian needs are still significantly more likely to receive humanitarian funds than predictable chronic needs.

Latest articles

From Humanitarian

UN appeals: What does underfunding really mean?

Underfunded appeals: Understanding the consequences, improving the system

Direct funding to local and national responders shows slow progress

Global humanitarian assistance report 2018

Progress report 1: Supporting Grand Bargain signatories in meeting commitments to greater transparency

Connecting IATI and FTS for streamlined humanitarian reporting

Related topics

  • affected 6
  • aid 45
  • Appeals 26
  • CERF 8
  • governments 21
  • humanitarian need 38
  • Humanitarian Posts 234
  • NGO 6
  • UN 21
See all topics

Sections

Data blog Publications Events Working with us

Quick links

Contact us Topics Our consultancy services Open DI — publishing to IATI

Newsletter

Sign up for the Development Initiatives newsletter to receive regular news and updates from DI.

Creative Commons

This site's content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

© Development Initiatives 2018. Development Initiatives is the trading name of Development Initiatives Poverty Research Ltd, registered in England and Wales, Company No. 06368740;
DI International Ltd, registered in England and Wales, Company No. 5802543, Registered Address: North Quay House, Quay Side, Temple Back, Bristol, BS1 6FL, UK; and Development Initiatives Poverty Research America Inc. (a 501(C)3 company registered in the state of Delaware with the registration number 5737757), Registered Address: 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801. View our privacy policy. View our Modern slavery and human trafficking statement.