Development Initiatives
  • Our work
    • Poverty
      • Citizen-generated data
      • The P20 Initiative: data to leave no one behind
    • More on poverty
    • Resources
      • Investments to End Poverty
      • International Aid Transparency Initiative
    • More on resources
    • Data use
      • Data Support Service in Kenya and Uganda
      • Development Data Hub
    • More on data use
    • Humanitarian
      • Global humanitarian assistance report 2018
      • Monitoring the Grand Bargain commitment on transparency
    • More on humanitarian
  • Development Data Hub
  • News
  • Events
  • Blogs
    • Latest data blogs
      • What does new World Bank data tell us about progress on poverty?
      • The needs of Kenyans by county: exploring the latest poverty data
      • The latest trends in UK aid spending on nutrition
      • See latest data blogs
    • Latest comment blogs
      • UN appeals: What does underfunding really mean?
      • How can blended financing help the world’s poorest?
      • Development cooperation for improved data
      • See latest comment blogs
    • Latest innovation blogs
      • Exploring concepts and practices to increase data use: A short learning paper
      • What are the principles of joined-up data?
      • Opinion: The case for metadata
      • See latest innovation blogs
  • Publications
    • Latest publications
      • Six ways to refocus ODA to end poverty and meet the SDGs
      • Underfunded appeals: Understanding the consequences, improving the system
      • Final ODA data for 2017 – persistent trends raise concerns
      • See all publications
    • Publication formats
      • Reports
      • Briefings
      • Factsheets
  • Media
    • Media
      • As the experts on data about poverty and resources, we can help journalists with a wide range of reliable statistics and evidence for articles that relate to our areas of work.
    • Latest press releases
      • Launch: Investments to End Poverty 2018
      • What do the 2018/2019 national budget estimates mean for Kenya's poorest households?
      • Development Initiatives named new host of the Global Nutrition Report
      • See all press releases
    • Useful links
      • Briefings
      • Data blog
      • Factsheets
  • About
    • About us
      • Our story
      • Our work
      • Our consultancy services
      • Our team
      • Finances — being transparent
      • Open DI — Publishing to IATI
      • Contact us
    • Working with us
      • Working for us
      • Vacancies
      • Partnerships

Searching Site...

Aid down slightly in 2014, but what else does the new DAC data tell us?

by Rob Tew

Apr 10, 2015

Resources

Data blog


After reaching a peak in 2013, official development assistance (ODA) fell by 0.5% in real terms in 2014: Collectively, ODA from the 28 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) country donors (DAC-28) totalled US$134.4 billion in 2014, compared with US$135.1 billion in 2013 (all data in constant 2013 prices).[1]

15 of the 28 DAC countries saw ODA levels fall: The largest fall was recorded by Japan, with ODA falling by US$1.8 billion. Japan’s increase in ODA in 2013 was boosted by exchange rate factors and one-off debt relief to Myanmar. France recorded a reduction of US$1 billion in 2014.  This follows a similarly large fall in 2013, meaning that French ODA has declined by 18% over the last two years.

However, 13 donors recorded increased ODA: Total ODA from Germany rose by US$1.7 billion, while ODA from the US and Sweden rose by US$0.7 billion and US$0.6 billion, respectively.

Proportional changes in DAC-28 ODA, 2013–2014 (constant 2013 prices)

1


Five DAC donors still meet 0.7%:
Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg and the UK all maintained ODA above the UN 0.7% of gross national income (GNI) target. The UK maintained 0.7% having reached this level for the first time in 2013. By contrast, the Netherlands fell below 0.7%, having met 0.7% from 1975 until 2012.

Although most donors (18) saw ODA as a proportion of GNI fall: Norway saw the largest relative fall among DAC donors (1.07% to 0.99%), though it remains the third most generous DAC donor using this measure. Other significant falls were reported by Ireland (0.46% to 0.38%), Australia (0.33% to 0.27%) and France (0.41% to 0.36%).

2

* Three donors (Japan, Sweden and UK) use SNA93/ESA95 as the basis for calculating GNI.

Most donors have changed how they calculate GNI: 25 of the DAC-28 have adopted a new international measure of GNI against which they report their ODA. This tends to lead to slight upward revisions of GNI and so corresponding falls in ODA/GNI ratios. The three donors still reporting ODA as a share of GNI on the old measure of GNI are Japan, Sweden (who reported a rise in this measure from 1.01% to 1.10%) and the UK (who reported just over 0.7% for the second year running).

Download the data

Notes

[1] All US$ figures in this note are 2013 constant prices.

* Three donors (Japan, Sweden and UK) use SNA93/ESA95 as the basis for calculating GNI.

Source

OECD, DAC 2014 provisional data release, 8 April 2015, advance 2014 spreadsheet and DAC database, table 1

Author

Rob Tew

Head of Research & Analysis

Latest articles

From Resources

Six ways to refocus ODA to end poverty and meet the SDGs

How can blended financing help the world’s poorest?

Final ODA data for 2017 – persistent trends raise concerns

Enhancing access to safe water and improved sanitation services in Kenya

Strengthening subnational government own-source revenue mobilisation in Kenya

Launch: Investments to End Poverty 2018

Sections

Data blog Publications Events Working with us

Quick links

Contact us Topics Our consultancy services Open DI — publishing to IATI

Newsletter

Sign up for the Development Initiatives newsletter to receive regular news and updates from DI.

Creative Commons

This site's content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

© Development Initiatives 2018. Development Initiatives is the trading name of Development Initiatives Poverty Research Ltd, registered in England and Wales, Company No. 06368740;
DI International Ltd, registered in England and Wales, Company No. 5802543, Registered Address: North Quay House, Quay Side, Temple Back, Bristol, BS1 6FL, UK; and Development Initiatives Poverty Research America Inc. (a 501(C)3 company registered in the state of Delaware with the registration number 5737757), Registered Address: 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801. View our privacy policy. View our Modern slavery and human trafficking statement.